
Most of the philosophical views are so strongly built regarding the
allegory of the cave. When he talks about the spiritual enlightenment, he tries
to tell the readers to possess the knowledge superior to the material entities.
With the help of the spiritual realm, a person can be able to see reality in
the shadows; he can grow accustomed to the sight of the upper world. Similarly,
the next strength can be his saying about the ideal entities. He says that the
soul is the actual instrument of knowledge. No professors can put knowledge
into the soul. The wisdom is innate whereas the knowledge is acquired by
learning to the sight of being good. Finally, the next strength would be the
ideal rulers should rule the state. The most educated, enlightened and intelligent
people who have the spiritual pleasures of the upper world can only bring
happiness to the world. But, all these points are not that suitable in this
highly materialistic and selfish world. The sensory perceptions rather than the
spiritual realms are true today’s world. Similarly, knowledge doesn’t exist in
the soul. Senses are superior to spirit. And, if all the best people be the
rulers, who will run the other professions equally responsible for the
development of the nation?
Plato makes a contrast between the people living in a world of
senses and the world of ideal entities. The former belongs to the sensory
perceptions whereas the latter belongs to the spiritual perceptions. In
platonic views, the first is the world of ignorance, innocence and illusions,
but the second one is the world of knowledge, enlightenment and realities.
The world in which we live is like a cave. People are mostly like
prisoners-ignorant, innocence and unenlightened. And, those who are enlightened
live far in comfort. Those educated people who enter this world with all wisdom
are considered to be insane. These wise people have much difficulty in adjustment.
Lincoln and Gandhi can be considered as those educated people.
(think about the
contemplations as I couldn’t think abt that now)
Socrates outlines a programme for an ideal state where the happiness
is to be for all the citizens, to be in the whole state. A according to Plato,
the best minds of the state must continue to ascend until they arrive at the
good. These enlightened and educated philosophers have to take care and
providence of others. Though they cant be obliged to do the service of the
people, they can be convinced that they are brought in this world to be the
true rulers of the state. They can be the kings of themselves as well as the
other citizens. They can educate others too. They have the ability to see much
more than the inhabitants in the den. They can see the truth and beauty. When
such enlightened people rule the state, the state will get its best and will be
quietly governed. There can be a great possibility of happiness to many people.
On the other side, these highly educated people don’t show any enthusiasm or
willingness to rule the lower world because they are provided with the best
spiritual delights in the upper world. Because of their wisdom and virtues,
they are already richer than the rich. So, they are reluctant towards governing
the state. In spite of this, if they are really obliged by the needs of people,
they will serve the state best for the sake of humanity.
This programme looks more suitable
in Socrates’ time. At the present time, the highly educated people are running
after luxury and comfort. Instead of spreading their wisdom and virtues, they
seem busy filling their pockets. Today, both the educated and uneducated are
running after their selfish personal interests. As a result, many people are
still in darkness. The educated people like politicians in our country can act
as the best example. These people seem busy fulfilling their mere personal
desires instead of utilizing their wisdom for the nation.
The Communist Manifesto
.
The most famous generalization of
Marx is “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class
struggles”. Marx has shown the development of the human society which seems
progressive. He has shown how the society has been constantly developing due to
the class struggles.
In the earlier epochs, the history
had many orders. The society got arranged with the many stages of social rank.
In the ancient Rome,
there were patricians, knights, slaves, plebeians, etc. In the middle ages,
feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, serfs, journeyman, apprentices, etc came
and under them also different stages of classes came. From the serfs of the
middle ages, the chartered burghers came and later with them the first element
of the bourgeois came. And, with the ruins of the feudal society, the modern
bourgeois society came into existence. The modern bourgeois came with a long
course of development with a series of revolutions in the modes of production
and exchange. They developed all the instruments of production, extended
industry, markets, commerce, navigation, railways, political power, etc. With
the religious and political illusions, they have brought shameless and brutal
exploitation. They became the oppressor; as a result, the oppressed class
originated as the proletariat class i.e. the class of workers. At the present,
the class antagonism exists between the two classes i.e. the bourgeois and the
proletarians. The other classes also got mixed up in the proletarians. Today, the
only intention of the working class is to raise the proletarians to get the
political power of the nation. In this way, Marx makes the analysis of history
clear.